nanog mailing list archives
Re: how many roots must DNS have...
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 01:36:42 +0000 (UCT)
But it's OK. Really. There's only one root. Honest. Except for this one, which is being run with all the usual I* blessings: http://www.isi.edu/otdr/ Simon
Hum... this project, while it meets the technical criteria that describes an alternate root structure, differs in several aspects from the others in this space. ) It does not add any new code points, i.e. its the root zone that you would find in the production system. ) It is -NOT- a production system. It can/has/does go away on a regular basis for service and configuration changes. ) It is -ONLY- for the testing of IETF standards track protocols, like DNSSEC, IPv6, et.al. ) It does not have any I* blessing or approval. The various I* bodies have been made aware of this projects existance. ) To use this projects services, you must publish a testplan with specific goals and timeframes before authorization is given. this is not an exuastive list of the differences or of the criteria for using this engineering evnironment. So your insinuations that this is an approved alternate structure are disingenious at best. Please get your facts straight first. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches, (continued)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Alex Bligh (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Simon Higgs (Nov 18)
- RE: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Mathias Koerber (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Paul Vixie (Nov 18)
- how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) E.B. Dreger (Nov 18)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) measl (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Adrian Chadd (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Adrian Chadd (Nov 19)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have... bmanning (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Steve Gibbard (Nov 21)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) W.D.McKinney (Nov 22)
- RE: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Randy Bush (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 27)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Simon Higgs (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Joel Baker (Nov 18)