nanog mailing list archives
Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason
From: "Brett Frankenberger" <rbf () rbfnet com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:20:55 -0600 (CST)
I'm referring to the _vendor's_ support costs - as in, you don't need as many people in the TAC if people don't keep running into IOS bugs; you don't need as large of a RMA pool if the hardware is more reliable, etc.
What percentage of TAC personnel's time is spent dealing with calls that ultimately result in a BugID? NANOG isn't representative; mostly, TAC exists to take calls from idiots who bought a box that they don't know how to configure. Large network operators have a staff of people to handle that, so when they call TAC, the box is probably broken. I don't think that's the case with the majority of TAC cases, though. -- Brett
Current thread:
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason, (continued)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Jesper Skriver (Nov 27)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Paul Vixie (Nov 25)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Christian Kuhtz (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Sean Donelan (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Ian Duncan (Nov 26)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Alex Bligh (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Christopher A. Woodfield (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason jerry scharf (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Christopher A. Woodfield (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Brett Frankenberger (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Ryan O'Connell (Nov 27)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Alex Bligh (Nov 26)
- Re: Followup British Telecom outage reason Paul Vixie (Nov 26)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Joel Jaeggli (Nov 29)
- RE: Followup British Telecom outage reason Vadim Antonov (Nov 29)