nanog mailing list archives
Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:19:56 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Alex Bligh wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:23 AM -0800 "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org> wrote:No, you mean: the joy of a rapacious monopoly with a spineless regulator.Oh Sean's rants are always soooooo much better than mine...
Yes. But I'm more interested in how a provider manages to wipe out their entire national network. That takes talent. I'm sure BT has some clever network engineers, and they could have done it to themselves. On the other hand, BT uses the exact same equipment as US providers and other providers around the world. Is there some latent defect in the vendor gear we all use?
Current thread:
- BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Sean M. Doran (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Alex Bligh (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Terence (Nov 23)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 23)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Terence (Nov 23)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Alex Bligh (Nov 21)
- Message not available
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Rodney Thayer (Nov 21)
- Contact at pbi.net or sbcglobal.net ? Tim Stiles (Nov 22)