nanog mailing list archives

Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure

From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:01:12 -0000

--On Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:23 AM -0800 "Sean M. Doran"<smd () clock org> wrote:

No, you mean: the joy of a rapacious monopoly with a spineless regulator.


Oh Sean's rants are always soooooo much better than mine...

Alex Bligh
Personal Capacity

Current thread:

BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Sean M. Doran (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Alex Bligh (Nov 21)
  - Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Sean Donelan (Nov 21)
    - Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Terence (Nov 23)
    - Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 23)
    - Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Terence (Nov 23)
  - Message not available
    - Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Rodney Thayer (Nov 21)
    - Contact at pbi.net or sbcglobal.net ? Tim Stiles (Nov 22)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Giles Heron (Nov 21)
- Re: BT monopoly causes widespread network failure Jeff Mcadams (Nov 21)