nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches
From: Paul A Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 15:20:29 -0800
Sorry to burst your reality distortion bubble Paul, but there are a very large number of us who don't consider ICANN to be either representative of our best interests, nor the ultimate authority on "the Internet".
right. i've heard that. however, your actions don't support your words. otherwise you'd just start your own root zone with no NS RR's except those to your own TLD's, and you'd publish it to like-minded people, and you would not have a "fallback" domain that ends in .ORG, and you would not concern yourself with reachability by folks who follow the actual DNS specification and thus recognize only a single unique namespace. in other words, the fact that i am able to listen to your rants is proof that you do not believe what you're ranting about. if you want to prove me wrong, then it's simple. upgrade your system to IPv8 and exchange traffic only with those who have done likewise. of course, most of those people are only reachable by some other stargate, and jim for some reason numbered his stargate at "0" on the improbable assumption that that number isn't already in use somewhere else in IPv8-land.
Current thread:
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches, (continued)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches William Allen Simpson (Nov 17)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 17)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Randy Bush (Nov 17)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Sean Donelan (Nov 17)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Pat Myrto (Nov 17)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Randy Bush (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Paul Vixie (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches measl (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Andy Walden (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Paul A Vixie (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Alex Bligh (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Simon Higgs (Nov 18)
- RE: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Mathias Koerber (Nov 18)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Paul Vixie (Nov 18)
- how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) E.B. Dreger (Nov 18)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) measl (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Adrian Chadd (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 19)
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Adrian Chadd (Nov 19)
- Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches Sean Donelan (Nov 17)
- Message not available
- Re: how many roots must DNS have before it's considered broken (Re: ISP network design of non-authoritative caches) Simon Higgs (Nov 19)