nanog mailing list archives

Re: Namespace conflicts


From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:38:55 -0500


In message <20010309100228.A2521 () redhat com>, "Bryan C. Andregg" writes:

--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:10:09AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin mailed:
In my area of NJ, virtually every town's "obvious" .com domain names were=
=20
grabbed by one of two competing would-be service providers.  They had=20
absolutely no town-specific content -- but if the town wanted a Web=20
site, they had no choice but to deal with these folks.  I have no major=
=20
problem with first-come, first-served *productive* use of a domain name,
but frankly, that's not where the problem has been.  The problem has=20
been speculators and cybersquatters.

Uh, why couldn't the town just use <name>.nj.us or whatever the city specif=
ic
code was long ago and far way.

They grabbed those, too.


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb






Current thread: