nanog mailing list archives

Re: Namespace conflicts


From: Clayton Fiske <clay () bloomcounty org>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:04:32 -0800


On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:21:50AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:10:09AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin mailed:
In my area of NJ, virtually every town's "obvious" .com domain names were 
grabbed by one of two competing would-be service providers.  They had 
absolutely no town-specific content -- but if the town wanted a Web 
site, they had no choice but to deal with these folks.  I have no major 
[snip]
Uh, why couldn't the town just use <name>.nj.us or whatever the city specific
code was long ago and far way.

No.  However, they could use ci.<name>.nj.us, and that's where I usually go
if I'm looking for a particular city's web site.

The reason for this distinction is to support things like:

      ci.alameda.ca.us        City of Alameda
      co.alameda.ca.us        County of Alameda
      joesshoes.alameda.ca.us Joe's Shoe Shop in Alameda, CA

etc.  There's an RFC that spells all this out (1680 comes to mind, but not
sure that's the right number).

RFC1480 seems to be the one. 

-c





Current thread: