nanog mailing list archives

Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts

From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 18:49:43 -0500

On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 12:40:55AM +0100, Pim van Riezen wrote:


I'd say do away with DNS, let's go back to a voluntary HOSTS.TXT. It's
either that or Active Directory Hell.


Or stay with what we have.  Why is that not a valid option?

HOSTS.TXT certainly isn't, and a single-platform solution certainly isn't.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play), (continued)
- - - Re: Namespaces (was: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play) bob bownes (Mar 08)
    - Message not available
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Ben Browning (Mar 07)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Vadim Antonov (Mar 07)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Steve Sobol (Mar 07)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play David Charlap (Mar 08)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)
    - Namespace conflicts bob bownes (Mar 08)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts David Lesher (Mar 08)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts Pim van Riezen (Mar 08)
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)
    - RE: Namespace conflicts Tony Hain (Mar 08)
    - Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 09)
    - Message not available
    - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Ben Browning (Mar 08)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Steve Sobol (Mar 07)
  - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Simon Higgs (Mar 07)
  - Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Andrea Abrahamsen (Mar 08)