nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play
From: Andrea Abrahamsen <slinky () home com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 09:06:27 -0800
Good idea. Just make sure you send me the royalties. hehehe Steve Sobol wrote:
Pete Bowden wrote:Maybe we can register .com.sucks, and then modify our resolver search paths to search ".sucks" ... hmmm...Anyone see any reason why a couple of us couldn't set ourselves up as authoritative for the .sucks TLD? I doubt ICANN or any other organization is going to want it as a gTLD. :) -- Steven J. Sobol/CTO/JustThe.net LLC | sjsobol () NorthShoreTechnologies net SAY IT LOUD: I'M GEEK AND I'M PROUD! | 888.480.4NET (4638) 216.619.2NET (2638) http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net | http://ClevelandProductions.com http://JustThe.net | Powered by Linux, pizza, Coke, Cuervo, and cheap beer.
Current thread:
- Namespace conflicts, (continued)
- Namespace conflicts bob bownes (Mar 08)
- Re: Namespace conflicts David Lesher (Mar 08)
- Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts Pim van Riezen (Mar 08)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 08)
- RE: Namespace conflicts Tony Hain (Mar 08)
- Re: Namespace conflicts Shawn McMahon (Mar 09)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Ben Browning (Mar 08)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Simon Higgs (Mar 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Andrea Abrahamsen (Mar 08)