nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:20:07 +0300 (IDT)
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Michael Whisenant wrote:
Combine the loss of C.ROOT and the loss to E.ROOT for their loss of peering to NASA that happened last week and will happen again in a few weeks and they may have many issues related to this decision.
Maybe I'm missing something obvious but I can't help wondering why given the redundancy of the DNS system the loss of connectivity to 2 or 3 root-servers should have a significant effect on an ISP who is otherwise well connected and probably has a low latency/loss link to at least 2-3 of the remaining root DNS servers Anyone care to enlighten me ? Thanks - Rafi
Current thread:
- RE: C&W Peering, (continued)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering John Starta (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Eric Gauthier (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Leo Bicknell (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Richard Welty (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Vincent J. Bono (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Rafi Sadowsky (Jun 06)
- RE: C&W Peering Scott Patterson (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Matt Levine (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering (and nTH Percentile Unite!) James Thomason (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 09)