nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:51:23 -0400
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:55:14PM -0400, Christopher A. Woodfield wrote:
I think PSI is going to have to get itself some transit, and quickly.
I know almost nothing about bankruptcy, so I would love for someone who does to comment. Put simply, if a company can't pay its creditors and suppliers do they have any chance of entering into a new purchase agreement? I know that I personally wouldn't offer them Net-30 payment terms right now. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440 Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Current thread:
- Re: C&W Peering, (continued)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering ken harris. (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Mike Hughes (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering John Starta (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Eric Gauthier (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Leo Bicknell (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Richard Welty (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Vincent J. Bono (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Rafi Sadowsky (Jun 06)
- RE: C&W Peering Scott Patterson (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Matt Levine (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)