nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 4 Jun 2001 15:18:25 -0700
On Mon, 04 June 2001, Simon Lockhart wrote:
Well, I assumed PSI and/or C&W would have had some backup transit, if they were going to play that game, but...
By defintion a "tier 1" provider does not have any transit, backup or otherwise. If tier 1 providers terminate peering, there are no alternate routes between them. However, customers who are multihomed may be able to reach both of them. Likewise customers of other peers can reach both of them. But customers exclusively connected to one or the other battling peer can't reach customers exclusively attached to the other. Its been a while since we've had a real "tier 1" peering battle. Last time ANS lasted a couple of weeks before they caved in and joined the CIX after the CIX filtered out non-member routes.
Current thread:
- RE: C&W Peering, (continued)
- RE: C&W Peering John Starta (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Eric Gauthier (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Leo Bicknell (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Richard Welty (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Vincent J. Bono (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Rafi Sadowsky (Jun 06)
- RE: C&W Peering Scott Patterson (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Matt Levine (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering (and nTH Percentile Unite!) James Thomason (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 09)