nanog mailing list archives
Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home)
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () cybernothing org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 10:59:56 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
On 20 Jan 2001, Sean Donelan wrote:10 providers thought it was a good idea, but the two largest providers never responded to any inquiries.It's infuriating that the xenophobia and paranoia of the tier1s is such a roadblock to keeping networks running smoothly.
It is, but this issues keeps getting hashed and rehashed here, and absolutely nothing ever happens about it. Without buy-in from "people that matter" all of these endless discussions are simply more grist for the mill.
Current thread:
- Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Dan Hollis (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Steve Sobol (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Douglas A. Dever (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Steven J. Sobol (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Jared Mauch (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Steve Sobol (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Jared Mauch (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Patrick Greenwell (Feb 24)
- Re: Inter-provider communications (Re: nobody @home) Dan Hollis (Feb 24)