nanog mailing list archives
RE: net.terrorism
From: Sabri Berisha <sabri () vuurwerk nl>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:20:13 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote: Hi,
This whole thing is skirting around the ORBS issue. It is clear that Sabri wants AboveNet to allow ORBS into their system. This "net terrorism" thingy is simply a sham. Otherwise, why would Sabri want access to the ORBS system?
I could not care less about ORBS in this case. My point is announcing netblocks while you partially nullroute it. Which is imho actively blackholing. But since a lot of people on this list disagree with me (some do agree, but mailed me in private). Anyways, I will stop my postings to this list about this matter, people who want to continue the thread (or just rant to me about my supposed cluelessness) will get answers in private. -- /* Sabri Berisha, non-interesting network dude. * * CCNA, BOFH, Systems admin Linux/FreeBSD */
Current thread:
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism), (continued)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Anne Marcel (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Mark Mentovai (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Joshua Goodall (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? Mark Mentovai (Feb 24)
- Re: net.terrorism Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- RE: net.terrorism Sabri Berisha (Feb 24)