nanog mailing list archives
Re: net.terrorism
From: Jerry Scharf <scharf () vix com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 11:43:31 -0800
I can't resist trying to sum this up: Somebody wants to talk to an ORBS server and has Abovenet transit. They don't like being caught in the orbs/abovenet mess. So rather than a) getting a new provider b) getting another provider and fixing the local routing to use them to ORBS the person opted for c) send a misleading flame message to NANOG Operational issues of enforcing trafic delivery policies for customers has been discussed till it's dead. Everyone knows where they stand, and anyone who does it has is as part of their service agreement. As has been pointed out, this is not a subject that will engender any sympathy in this group. does anything else need to be said? If not, let's let this die. jerry
Current thread:
- How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism), (continued)
- How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Anne Marcel (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Paul Vixie (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Anne Marcel (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Mark Mentovai (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Joshua Goodall (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? Mark Mentovai (Feb 24)
- RE: net.terrorism Sabri Berisha (Feb 24)