nanog mailing list archives
RE: net.terrorism
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:54:43 -0800
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 11:36 AMethical question like this.I was under the misconception the 'O' in NANOG stood for 'Operations' not 'Ethics'. But this would explain lots of other posts here which I had previously considered off topic.s/operations/orations/?
That can't be; whilst I've read an awful lot, I haven't "heard" a thing <g>. Is there an aural back-channel to NANOG? <going back to configuring root servers now ...>
Current thread:
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism), (continued)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Mark Mentovai (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism) Joshua Goodall (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? Mark Mentovai (Feb 24)
- Re: net.terrorism Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- RE: net.terrorism Sabri Berisha (Feb 24)