nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixed
From: Rachel Warren <rachel () plur net>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:01:48 -0700
The suitcase nuclear bomb that takes out my facility in one location is very likely to take out my other facility in the same metro area. And probably all the customers who would remotely care.I don't know about the others in this thread, but the suitcase nuclear bomb is well outside the types of things I worry about protecting against, and in fact were one to explode I think 'lack of internet access' would be _WAY_ down on my list of priorities.
Hopefully Sean was being a bit over the top. :) A bomb threat is definately something to worry about, though. I wish I remembered more of the details or a news article to substantiate, but what I do remember about a year ago was a bomb threat at the non-ghetto MAE-EAST facility in Vienna, VA (I remember we were all wondering why all the WCOM people were leaving the building). If a bomb (threat) actually had occured, things would have definately been unhappy. Rachel -- But it is a characteristic of wisdom not to do desperate things. - Thoreau
Current thread:
- Re: multi-homing fixed, (continued)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Howard C. Berkowitz (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Alex Pilosov (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Charles Sprickman (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixed Steve Schaefer (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixed Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixed Mitch Halmu (Aug 29)
- RE: multi-homing fixed David Hares (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Rachel Warren (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Grant A. Kirkwood (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Scott Stursa (Aug 28)
- Message not available
- Re: multi-homing fixed Rachel Warren (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed Peter Francis (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixed John Payne (Aug 28)