nanog mailing list archives
RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () MHSC com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:39:12 -0700
-----Original Message----- From: Timothy Brown [mailto:tcb () ga prestige net] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 1:32 PMWhat 'threshold' has triggered this sudden event, with routes going
Which sucks, because the better choice for them is to ignore the political concerns and do the technically responsible thing, which is bring their content or resources, whatever they are, closer to points in the Internet where they are most commonly used. There's really very little to be gained by announcing their own space as opposed to having a collocation provider with good connectivity providing them blocks out of their space.
au contrare. There's LOTs to be gained.
They just come from a larger enterprise mentality where they work very hard to make sure all the resources are centralized and controlled by one or two people.
The key word is "control" and the right form of responsibility is "fiscal", not "technical".
Current thread:
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Todd (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Andrew Brown (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Thomas Marshall Eubanks (Sep 23)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report nicholas harteau (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report jlewis (Sep 22)