nanog mailing list archives
Re: When IPv6 ... if ever?
From: batz <batsy () vapour net>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:20:06 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Dana Hudes wrote: :NAT is more than just a means to ease IP address space use. :The use of a dynamic NAT pool allows the hiding of internal IP :topology, thereby increasing security. My questions took for granted that v6 does both. I was just wondering if there has been a comparison done, or there were published studies of one as a substitute for the other. -- batz Chief Reverse Engineer Superficial Intelligence Research Defective Technologies
Current thread:
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever?, (continued)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Dave Morton (Sep 02)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Leo Bicknell (Sep 02)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Majdi S. Abbas (Sep 02)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Masataka Ohta (Sep 03)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Majdi S. Abbas (Sep 03)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Masataka Ohta (Sep 03)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Nathan Lane (Sep 04)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? batz (Sep 07)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Dana Hudes (Sep 07)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Andrew Brown (Sep 07)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? batz (Sep 07)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Masataka Ohta (Sep 07)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? batz (Sep 08)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Masataka Ohta (Sep 09)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Leo Bicknell (Sep 03)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Masataka Ohta (Sep 10)
- Re: When IPv6 ... if ever? Andrew Brown (Sep 10)