nanog mailing list archives

Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:34:05 -0500

On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:16:00 PST, Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>  said:

We have enough problems from DOS attacks originating from the script
kiddies, we don't need DOS attacks from our upstreams
(uncontracted/unrequested port filtering).


The two are inversely related.
-- 
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Operating Systems Analyst
                                Virginia Tech

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Christian Kuhtz (Nov 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 20)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Adrian Chadd (Nov 20)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 20)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 20)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Shawn McMahon (Nov 20)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 20)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Roeland Meyer (Nov 20)
  - "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)
    - Re: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Bora Akyol (Nov 20)
    - Re: "...the IPv4 TOS field should be end-to-end...." Joe Abley (Nov 21)
  - RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Jason Slagle (Nov 21)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police Stephen Sprunk (Nov 21)
- RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police Hank Nussbacher (Nov 20)
  - Re: ISPs as content-police or method-police JIM FLEMING (Nov 20)

(Thread continues...)