nanog mailing list archives

Re: pop server in an ISP environment


From: Peter van Dijk <petervd () vuurwerk nl>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 20:26:23 +0200


On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:22:21AM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:

Indeed. For example, for the company I work for (that is burdened by the
64k limit right now because of lot's of stock linux 2.0.x kernels), I am
developing a mail-solution that doesn't chew up UIDs for popboxes.

Try the user-less qmail install, HOWTO at:

http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.html

We're about to implement this.

I have looked at it but it does not fit my needs at all. The system I'm
developing (which _is_ based on qmail tho), has several advantages. Also, I
don't need 'user-less' stuff, because all customers already have a
hosting-account for FTP and shell.

The big advantage is that users own and control their own mailinglists,
popoboxes, forwards and all that and normally don't need _any_ intervention
from us to get anything done. This also allows for easy quota-enforcing and
accounting - all stuff from one customer is under 1 UID. 

With that user-less stuff, AFAICS the admin needs to do work for each
popbox created. This ofcourse can be automated, but is still a centralized
process. We are moving towards decentralization as far as possible while
still keeping a grip.

Greetz, Peter.
-- 
petervd () vuurwerk nl - Peter van Dijk [student:developer:madly in love]



Current thread: