nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGPs and services?
From: nicholas harteau <nrh () ikami com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 10:05:41 -0500
Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
ww () shadowfax styx org: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 10:34 PMWhat is the general feeling about running routing protocols on web/dns/mail servers?Technically, not a problem. However, there is a school of thought that thinks that to be a bad policy. That routing functions should be on appliance-level systems, like routers.
Has anyone given any thought to using some mechanism like 'redistribute connected' in conjunction with IPIP tunnels to hosts? When host goes poof, tunnel interface goes down, route goes away. No complicated routing processes are involved. -- nicholas harteau nrh () ikami com
Current thread:
- IGPs and services? nicholas harteau (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? ww (May 16)
- RE: IGPs and services? Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? R.P. Aditya (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? nicholas harteau (May 17)
- RE: IGPs and services? jlewis (May 17)
- Re: IGPs and services? Bryan C. Andregg (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? jlewis (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Brandon Ross (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 19)
- Re: IGPs and services? Stephen Sprunk (May 19)
- Re: IGPs and services? Neil J. McRae (May 19)
- RE: IGPs and services? Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? ww (May 16)
- RE: IGPs and services? Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 19)
- Re: IGPs and services? ww (May 18)