nanog mailing list archives
RE: IGPs and services?
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 23:22:09 -0700
ww () shadowfax styx org: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 10:34 PM
What is the general feeling about running routing protocols on web/dns/mail servers?
Technically, not a problem. However, there is a school of thought that thinks that to be a bad policy. That routing functions should be on appliance-level systems, like routers. There is also some merit in that appliances are more reliable, mainly because nothing *else* can cause an operational interrupt. Unix systems are *real* good about process control. but, there are still some things that makes it advisable to reboot a system, at times. If that system is ALSO a critical router then the entire net is down until the reboot is complete. It is generally not considered a stable state of affairs. Having been in exactly that situation, I can tell you that it isn't fun. Eventually, the pain aversion therapy works and your behavior is modified accordingly.
Current thread:
- IGPs and services? nicholas harteau (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? ww (May 16)
- RE: IGPs and services? Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? R.P. Aditya (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? nicholas harteau (May 17)
- RE: IGPs and services? jlewis (May 17)
- Re: IGPs and services? Bryan C. Andregg (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? jlewis (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Brandon Ross (May 18)
- Re: IGPs and services? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 19)
- Re: IGPs and services? Stephen Sprunk (May 19)
- RE: IGPs and services? Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 16)
- Re: IGPs and services? ww (May 16)