nanog mailing list archives
Re: CIDR Report
From: Mark Kent <mark () noc mainstreet net>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 09:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
Take a look at: http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr.hist.plot.html
I think the other parts of the data also point to shoddy aggregation (not that this is new). Look at some of the /8 nets that have been broken down and you'll see some sequences crying out for order. I see (approximately) this right now: 600 pieces of net 12 850 pieces of net 24 1600 pieces of net 63 900 pieces of net 64 Just eyeballing the announcements shows that this could be a *lot* smaller. But even if all we saw were /19s in there we could expect to see 2048 /19s per /8, which is larger than what we see now. Is there data that shows the possible "NetGain" over the past 6 years? And if so, is it getting better or worse? -mark
Current thread:
- CIDR Report pjnesser (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Mikael Abrahamsson (May 13)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 13)
- RE: CIDR Report Daniel L. Golding (May 14)
- Multi-home I (was CIDR Report) Rural CNE (May 13)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Christian Nielsen (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Vijay Gill (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Mark Kent (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Geoff Huston (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Jeremy Porter (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: CIDR Report Owen DeLong (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Danny McPherson (May 13)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Danny McPherson (May 13)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report ww (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Joe Provo - Network Architect (May 14)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland M.J. Meyer (May 13)
- Re: CIDR Report Mikael Abrahamsson (May 13)