nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming?
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 11:52:26 -0500
In message <3.0.5.32.20000301174204.0081c280 () max ibm net il>, Hank Nussbacher w rites:
Radware has a product called Linkproof and claims that it negates the need for BGP-4 and portable IP addresses: http://www.radware.com/product/lproof/Default.htm I have a customer that requires multihoming and they want to use Linkproof and I want them to do BGP-4. Does anyone have any experience using this as an alternative to BGP-4?
The Web page states that the device uses NAT. I can't speak for others, but NAT is against my religion.... --Steve Bellovin
Current thread:
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming?, (continued)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Gary E. Miller (Mar 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Randy Bush (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Marc Slemko (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Pete Templin (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Peter A. van Oene (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Adrian Chadd (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 13)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Scott McGrath (Mar 13)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Randy Bush (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Alex Bligh (Mar 14)
- Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Mar 15)