nanog mailing list archives

RE: RFC 1918


From: rdobbins () netmore net
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:21:53 -0700



If people don't want whiners niggling them about the RFC 1918 addrs
showing up in traceroutes, they should just put RFC 1918 filters on
their borders, so that the whiners simply won't get returns to their
traceroutes.

-Bennett

I don't know if denying folks the use of legitimate testing tools due to
deliberate misuse of RFC 1918 addressing - after all, its title is 'Address
Allocation for Private Internet' - is such a hot idea.

To quote from the RFC:

        With the proliferation of TCP/IP technology worldwide, including
outside the Internet    itself, an increasing number of non-connected
enterprises use this technology and its         addressing capabilities for
sole intra-enterprise communications, without any       intention to ever
directly connect to other enterprises or the Internet itself. 

I don't see much ambiguity there concerning the intent of the authors, nor
the IETF in accepting their premises.

---------------------------------------------------------------
 Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () netmore net> // 818.535.5024 voice



Current thread: