nanog mailing list archives
RE: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?
From: Vijay Gill <vijay () umbc edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:00:34 -0400
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Kai Schlichting wrote:
A network design that doesn't allow tracing back spoofed traffic? Way to go, UUnet.
It is fairly clear to anyone with a smidgen of technical competence that this is not a network design issue per se, it is an equipment issue (and a router one at that). It is trivially easy to throw stones at other peoples design while sitting behind the helm of your very own multi-terabit ISP of comparable size, I'm sure.
Now, lets watch Vijay rush to the defense of his, uhm, stock options.
What options would these be? /vijay
Current thread:
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?, (continued)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Shawn McMahon (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Rodney Joffe (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Ryan Tucker (Jul 07)
- RE: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Joe Shaw (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Steve Sobol (Jul 07)
- Message not available
- RE: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Kai Schlichting (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Chris (Jul 07)
- RE: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Vijay Gill (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Steve Noble (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Steve Sobol (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? John Kristoff (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Steve Sobol (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? John Kristoff (Jul 07)