nanog mailing list archives
Re: New form of packet attack named Stream
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:06:08 -0500
Actually, you provided enough details, so any unix guy who knows his sockets can write the program in fifteen minutes.then why have six people written to me asking me to ask jamie for it? </rhetorical>
because... <rant> a lot of people are stupid lazy f*cks, they're 5kr1pt k1dd33z, or they're 4$$h0135. consequently they think they can just ask you ask for it, and then you'll forward it back to them because you're a "nice guy". which you probably are, but you're also no dummy. for most of these people, they just want more things they can use to annoy other people. they know next to nothing, don't seem to want to, and probably couldn't learn anything if their life depended on it. they're also probably 12, and use aol. </rant> thank you. -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior () daemon org * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" andrew () crossbar com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
Current thread:
- New form of packet attack named Stream Henry R. Linneweh (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Joe Shaw (Jan 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Vadim Antonov (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Pat Myrto (Jan 21)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Richard Steenbergen (Jan 21)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Damon M. Conway (Jan 21)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 22)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Randy Bush (Jan 20)
- Re: New form of packet attack named Stream Andrew Brown (Jan 20)