nanog mailing list archives
Re: CEF Load balancing...
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper () skriver dk>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:51:50 +0100
On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 10:25:37PM +1030, Mark Prior wrote:
It's almost safe to use it, if you can turn off features which cause troubles. CEF is not trouble-making feature except some configurations. Except when the router decides to turn CEF off all by itself due to malloc failure.
That sounds like a memory leak, have you tried the latest versions ? in 12.0(x)S there was a catastrophic memory leak in 12.0(7)S related to cef ... /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE# 5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
Current thread:
- CEF Load balancing... Alex Rubenstein (Jan 14)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Jesper Skriver (Jan 14)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... William Allen Simpson (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Jesper Skriver (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Alex Rubenstein (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Wayne Bouchard (Jan 17)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... William Allen Simpson (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Jesper Skriver (Jan 14)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Mark Prior (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Forrest W. Christian (Jan 16)
- RE: CEF Load balancing... Sykes, Phil (Jan 16)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Neil J. McRae (Jan 17)
- Re: CEF Load balancing... Randy Bush (Jan 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: CEF Load balancing... Martin, Christian (Jan 17)