Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations

[NANOG Mailing List <nanog () EnterZone Net>]

On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:

> > The point is, those /27s, /30s and /32s are *not* on the 'Net, they are 
> > internal to C&W.  You should not condemn the global table because C&W leaks 
> > specifics to their customers.
>
> I am not connected directly to C&W, but via Exodus and I see the same
> routes like 63.84.242.192/26. So they not only inside of C&W and to their
> customers.
>
> -- 
> Regards, Ulf.

As we see 63.82.242.192:

*63.80.0.0/13
  Neighbor: 209.115.127.21
  Description: FNSI TRANSIT
        ASPath: 6259 3549 701(IGP)
        Nexthop: 209.115.127.21 Weight: 0
        Localpref: 100
        Last update: Tue Feb 22 11:31:39 2000

Sheesh folks.  If your upstream isn't filtering at /24, you REALLY can do
it yourself.  If it bothers you so much, contact whomever is leaking
prefixes longer than /24.  Don't bitch and whine about it. 


John Fraizer