nanog mailing list archives

Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations


From: Ulf Zimmermann <ulf () Alameda net>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:14:17 -0800


On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:16:11AM -0800, I Am Not An Isp wrote:

At 01:27 AM 2/19/00 -0700, John M. Brown wrote:
 >
 >Yes, 3561 is one of our transit.  This isn't about what filters we have
 >or don't have.  its about the fact that from my view there are some
 >announcements
 >that really shouldn't be on the net in the first place.

The point is, those /27s, /30s and /32s are *not* on the 'Net, they are 
internal to C&W.  You should not condemn the global table because C&W leaks 
specifics to their customers.

I am not connected directly to C&W, but via Exodus and I see the same
routes like 63.84.242.192/26. So they not only inside of C&W and to their
customers.

-- 
Regards, Ulf.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-769-2936
Alameda Networks, Inc. | http://www.Alameda.net  | Fax#: 510-521-5073



Current thread: