nanog mailing list archives
Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 13:54:33 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
If people really started doing there part on cleaning up their announcements I bet we could reduce the total routes back down to some nice number........
Hello, John, What is some 'nice' number? Are your routers suffering from the added amount of routes? (that's not rhetorical, but a true question; no disrespect meant). I think that I'd rather see some additional routes in the BGP tree if it meant smarter (as smart as smart can be in regards to BGP) routing information.
*> 63.84.242.192/26 166.48.176.25 0 3561 14510 i *> 128.88.250.0/27 166.48.176.25 0 3561 2516 2915 2915 2915 2915 151 i *> 128.88.250.32/29 166.48.176.25 0 3561 2516 2915 2915 2915 2915 151 i *> 137.39.250.20/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 158.205.225.40/29 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4694 ? *> 166.32.131.160/27 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 166.35.174.160/27 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.98.105.48/28 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.141.223.224/27 166.48.176.25 0 3561 6081 7053 7053 7053 7053 i *> 206.142.63.0/28 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.151.223.0/26 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.64/28 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.80/28 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.96/27 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.128/27 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.160/28 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.180/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.184/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.188/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.151.223.192/27 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.152.253.0/27 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 206.157.77.40/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.157.77.56/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.157.77.96/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.157.77.108/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.157.77.152/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.157.77.200/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.157.77.208/30 166.48.176.25 0 3561 i *> 206.171.94.0/26 166.48.176.25 0 3561 3549 13405 i *> 206.218.185.192/26 166.48.176.25 0 3561 3549 i *> 207.49.17.192/28 166.48.176.25 0 3561 4293 i *> 207.51.164.128/26 166.48.176.25 0 3561 11192 i
Current thread:
- More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations John M. Brown (Feb 18)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations Steve Rubin (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations John M. Brown (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations I Am Not An Isp (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations Ulf Zimmermann (Feb 22)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations NANOG Mailing List (Feb 22)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations John M. Brown (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations Steve Rubin (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations I Am Not An Isp (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations John M. Brown (Feb 19)
- Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations jmalcolm (Feb 20)
- Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (OT) Mr. James W. Laferriere (Feb 20)
- Re: Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (OT) jlewis (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Odd problem on very old Cisco ios (OT) I Am Not An Isp (Feb 21)