nanog mailing list archives
RE: whois broke again?
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:47:56 -0800
Rodney said what I was going to, but I'll add this http://www.opensrs.org/ If you can stomache that, then I have more of the same. For the record, I've tried to get you guy's attention with this stuff over two years ago. Y'all strongly told me it was non-operational. But, when systems start failing, and it becomes an operational issue, it's way too late.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of William Allen Simpson Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2000 12:51 PM To: Roeland M.J. Meyer Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: whois broke again? "Roeland M.J. Meyer" wrote:Then I suggest that you do. I wouldn't sign the NDA, but you might.What NDA? It's draft-hollenbeck-rrp-01.txt. But this is irrelevant to the whois discussion.With SRS, this is no longer possible as the whois data is already distributed among NSI's channel market, the Registrars. Eachare independententities. The only real target you have to fire at is the ICANN. GFL ... they're broke.I think we must be talking at cross purposes. The domain whois data is located in whois servers, maintained by the NSI registry. It is updated by registrars. The NSI registry whois seems to be falling down and cannot get up. We need a good system of distributed whois servers, just as we have a robust system of distributed DNS servers. We've talked about this before. Rather than complaining about NSI, folk need to get off their duffs and make it happen. I don't have the kind of bandwidth that we should have at the whois servers, so I cannnot offer space. All I can do is chearlead (and write code). Are we lacking an incremental distribution protocol for whois? What about rwhois? (RFC-2167 Informational) What about whois++? (RFC-1913 & 1914 Proposed Standards) WSimpson () UMich edu Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Current thread:
- Re: whois broke again?, (continued)
- Re: whois broke again? William Allen Simpson (Feb 20)
- RE: whois broke again? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? William Allen Simpson (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Rodney Joffe (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? William Allen Simpson (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? bmanning (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? William Allen Simpson (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? bmanning (Feb 21)
- Re: whois broke again? Rodney Joffe (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Paul Vixie (Feb 21)
- RE: whois broke again? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Feb 20)
- RE: whois broke again? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Feb 20)
- RE: whois broke again? Patrick Greenwell (Feb 21)
- RE: whois broke again? Patrick Greenwell (Feb 21)
- RE: whois broke again? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Feb 21)
- Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) William Allen Simpson (Feb 20)
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Rodney Joffe (Feb 21)
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Jeff Mcadams (Feb 21)
- RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Roeland M.J. Meyer (Feb 21)
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) William Allen Simpson (Feb 21)
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Bill Woodcock (Feb 21)