nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () mfnx net>
Date: 15 Dec 2000 12:37:23 -0800
WOW. Now THAT is juxtaposition! dan () netrail net (Daniel Golding) writes:
You don't really need a /20 to multihome or use BGP. Just get an ASN, multiple providers, and advertise your space. ...
tbates () cisco com (Tony Bates) writes:
Table History ------------- Date Prefixes 081200 95404 091200 95823 101200 95806 111200 95907 121200 95679 131200 95592 141200 95583 151200 95822
In other words, see http://www.academ.com/nanog/feb1997/multihoming.html.
Current thread:
- multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss) Jade E. Deane (Dec 15)
- RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss) Daniel Golding (Dec 15)
- Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Jonathan Disher (Dec 15)
- RE: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Daniel Golding (Dec 15)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) nanog (Dec 16)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Travis Pugh (Dec 17)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Daniel L. Golding (Dec 17)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Travis Pugh (Dec 17)
- Re: Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Daniel L. Golding (Dec 17)
- Filtering levels (was RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss)) Jonathan Disher (Dec 15)
- RE: multi-homing without the BGP (was RE: Packet Loss) Daniel Golding (Dec 15)