nanog mailing list archives
Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting
From: Daniel Senie <dts () senie com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:30:26 -0400
dan () netrail net wrote:
In a democratic process, which ARIN is, refusal to participate in the voting process, when eligible, usually removes one's standing to complain.
Cough up your $500 as an individual and you can buy a vote. Sounds democratic...
This is a non-issue. Very few hosting companies of any size are assigning individual IPs to individual sites. Most use some sort of HTTP file transfer as well.
Your authoritative statement is interesting. Could you provide the quantitative data that your statements represent? Using words like "few" and "most" tend to imply a knowledge of the numbers.
This is not due to any benefit or deficiency in HTTP or FTP. It's done this way to reduce IP usage, and to make the end-user experience a smooth one. End-users of web services generally prefer the dreaded "klicky" interface over it's trickier cousin, command line FTP.
Must be an interesting study. Would like to read it. Please give citations. In my clearly unscientific polling of a few friends, they had no trouble with using FTP, from a command line, no less. It'll be interesting to see just how small a minority we are.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Patrick Greenwell wrote:On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Alec H. Peterson wrote:"John A. Tamplin" wrote:Well, if the policy is that you have to use name-based hosting everywhere feasible and do something different for those customers that need something different, that can be quite a hardship on existing setups. For example, re-engineering all the tools to create and maintain vdom services, changing existing customer setups, etc. It is certainly easier to treat all hosting customers alike, rather than have completely separate setups and then have to change a customer from one to the other when they add or delete services (including downtime).That was also brought up at the meeting, however it was generally agreed that the address savings were worth the work.Very thoughtful of the assemblage to make that determination for everyone else.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts () senie com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com
Current thread:
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting, (continued)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Alec H. Peterson (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Rodney Joffe (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Patrick Greenwell (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Rodney Joffe (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Josh Richards (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting jlewis (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Patrick Greenwell (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Rodney Joffe (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting dan (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Bill Woodcock (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Daniel Senie (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting dan (Aug 31)
- Message not available
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting J. Scott Marcus (Aug 31)
- RE: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Christian Kuhtz (Aug 31)
- Re: What's a file extension? Jeff Wheat (Aug 31)
- Re: ARIN Policy on IP-based Web Hosting Patrick Evans (Aug 31)