nanog mailing list archives

Re: a different view of SNMP


From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex () Relcom EU net>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 14:35:26 +0400 (MSD)


It's _not the joke_ - a lot folks here prefere CISCO to WellFleet just 
because they dod not need to get GUI program, bring laptop with them and 
bother about upgrades. And _npw_ CISCO haveeasy WWW interface as the 
GUI-SNMP killer, as well.

Alex.

PS. BUt it's amazing - I thought everyone use the first september weekend 
to rest - it appear the people use this day to make a piece 
of philosophy -:).


On Sun, 5 Sep 1999 bandregg () redhat com wrote:

Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 09:46:43 -0400
From: bandregg () redhat com
To: Ron Buchalski <rbuchals () hotmail com>
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: a different view of SNMP 


On Sat, 04 Sep 1999 19:49:14 PDT, "Ron Buchalski" wrote: 
I sometimes wonder why Wellfleet nee Bay nee Nortel haven't already
taken over most of Cisco's market share for this reason given their
almost total embracement of SNMP for configuration and management.
Sure, they did leave a wide market niche for third party font-end tools
that actually worked, but at least they embraced the standards!  :-)


Well, could it be because Cisco routers _work_?  :-)

Or that you don't have to use that piece of crap called Configuration Mangler 
to deal with the thing and then pay for upgrades to a version of configuration 
software that doesn't leave the equipment in a bad state.
-- 
                 Bryan C. Andregg * <bandregg () redhat com> * Red Hat, Inc.

  1024/625FA2C5               F5 F3 DC 2E 8E AF 26 B0 2C 31 78 C2 6C FB 02 77
  1024/0x46E7A8A2     46EB 61B1 71BD 2960 723C 38B6 21E4 23CC 46E7 A8A2





Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 230-41-41, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)




Current thread: