nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regarding global BGP community values
From: Tony Li <tony1 () home net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 23:08:44 -0700
The fundamental feature for the REAL-TIME device (such as ROUTER) should be a lot of HOT-DOG mechanisms preventing /at least/ lost of the control over the device. In case of such _voracious_ processes (as BGP is) it should be used any mechanism preventing it from catching all existing resources (CPU and MEMORY in our case).
I think you mean a 'watch dog'. Most routers already have lots of 'hot dogs' around them. ;-) Tony
Current thread:
- RE: Regarding global BGP community values, (continued)
- RE: Regarding global BGP community values Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 08)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Danny McPherson (Oct 11)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 12)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Tony Li (Oct 12)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 13)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Tony Li (Oct 13)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 13)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 12)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 13)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Tony Li (Oct 13)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Sean Butler (Oct 17)
- Re: Regarding global BGP community values Alex P. Rudnev (Oct 18)