nanog mailing list archives

Re: spam whore, norcal-systems.net


From: I Am Not An Isp <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 15:17:55 -0800

At 05:54 PM 2/1/99 -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:

This kind of monitoring is probably a direct violation of 18 USC 2511, as
is a public announcement of the monitoring results. Indeed, at present, I'd
say it appears to be the best example of an unauthorized 3rd party
violation I've seen so far. (most [all previous] people don't admit
details, but we know some do it). Unless of course you have authorization
from norcal or all the recipients of those 2 million packets to monitor.
Since norcal isn't your customer, I don't suppose you have any paper
showing they gave you permission to collect and publish information about
their traffic.

What type of monitoring are you talking about?  Or are you saying I cannot
filter packets through my network as I please?

              --Dean

TTFN,
patrick

I Am Not An Isp
www.ianai.net
ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
"Think of it as evolution in action." - Niven & Pournelle


Current thread: