nanog mailing list archives

Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems)


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 18:16:58 -0500

On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 05:54:36PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
This kind of monitoring is probably a direct violation of 18 USC 2511, as
is a public announcement of the monitoring results. Indeed, at present, I'd
say it appears to be the best example of an unauthorized 3rd party
violation I've seen so far. (most [all previous] people don't admit
details, but we know some do it). Unless of course you have authorization
from norcal or all the recipients of those 2 million packets to monitor.
Since norcal isn't your customer, I don't suppose you have any paper
showing they gave you permission to collect and publish information about
their traffic.

        Interesting coroloary,

        Is it illegal for me to do flow-stats, as that examines packets
(in the same way one would filter), causing this data to be stored on
my flow stats server?

        - Jared

--
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.


Current thread: