nanog mailing list archives
RE: ORBS block
From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rkuhljr () uol com br>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 20:05:59 -0200
access-list 104 deny ip 202.36.148.5 0.0.0.255 any access-list 104 deny ip 202.36.147.16 0.0.0.255 any
For core routers and other not-access-list-friendly a #conf t ip route 202.36.148.0 255.255.255.0 nul0 ip route 202.36.147.0 255.255.255.0 nul0 may be a choice. It will, though, generate some SYN-flooding that would have to be dealed with at some point. Does someone know if routes to nul0 will make "ip unicast verify reverse-path" drop packets from those addresses ? Rubens Kuhl Jr.
Current thread:
- ORBS block Dean Anderson (Dec 16)
- RE: ORBS block Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Dec 16)
- Re: ORBS block Greg A. Woods (Dec 16)
- Re: ORBS block Tim Wolfe (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Alex P. Rudnev (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Paul Vixie (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Greg A. Woods (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Daniel Senie (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block Greg A. Woods (Dec 17)
- Re: ORBS block I Am Not An Isp (Dec 18)
- Re: ORBS block Derek Balling (Dec 18)
- Re: ORBS block J.D. Falk (Dec 18)
- Re: ORBS block Tim Wolfe (Dec 17)