nanog mailing list archives
Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad
From: David Stoddard <dgs () us net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:22:32 -0400 (EDT)
Miquel van Smoorenburg writes:
In article <199809182139.RAA10174 () us net>, David Stoddard <dgs () us net> wrote:There is more to this than meets the eye -- 28.8K is asynchronous and has start and stop bits for every byte, so there are a maximum of 2880 bytes/sec available over 28.8K. Then there is the issueAlmost every modem supports V42 error correction, which makes the modems speak a sort of synchronous with each other (actually data is transmitted in blocks with a start-of-block and end-of-block marker, and a checksum). That gets you 8 bits in a bith minus some negligeble V42 overhead. So an 28k8 modem can actually transfer almost 3.6 Kbytes/sec. Because of the block-oriented approach you do get a bit higher latency on interactive connections, which is why gamers often turn of V42.
As long as we are being specific about this, I omitted data compression too, which has a real effect on the data transfer rate as well. I also omitted 56K modems, ISDN dial-up, and other aspects of dial-up communications (like MPP). The point I was trying to make was not to disassemble 28.8K modem protocols, but to point out the fallacy in believing that a T1 line can only support 53 modems. As far as the start and stop bit issues go, they are controlled in the UART on the PC serial port, not the modem. Regardless of how the modem encodes and transmits data over the wire, the start and stop bits remain in the asynchronous serial protocol on PCs -- years ago, PC terminal programs used to let you control the number of start and stop bits you used to communicate with a device. The fact that DCE/DTE rates are usually higher that the actual speed of the modem connection negates some of the effect of start and stop bits, but they do exist. For modem to modem communications, start and stop bits were used up through 2400 baud when one bit = one tone. The method of one bit = one tone was dropped for other forms of encoding when modems started supporting connection speeds in excess of 2400 baud. While the 8000 bit/sec sampling rate of POTS lines can theoretically support up to 4000 Hz bandwidth, it is technically impossible to get this (reliably) out of the analog phone system. 28.8K modems need at least 3200 Hz of bandwidth on a POTS line to support 28.8K. All said, I still stand by my comment that 53 modems per T1 is ludicrous. Dave Stoddard dgs () us net
Current thread:
- And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Christian Nielsen (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Chris Cappuccio (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Richard Irving (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Jerry Scharf (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Paul Zawada (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad David Stoddard (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Miquel van Smoorenburg (Sep 21)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad David Stoddard (Sep 22)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad John Leong (Sep 22)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Robert Szarka (Sep 22)
- Message not available
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 23)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Paul Zawada (Sep 18)