nanog mailing list archives

Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad


From: David Stoddard <dgs () us net>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 17:39:35 -0400 (EDT)

Paul Zawada writes:
[snip ...] 
You can only fit 1.536 Mbps of real data down a T1 unless you've figured
out a funky way to send it across using the framing bits. 

8 b per channel * 24 channels per frame * 8000 frames per s = 1536000 bps
28.8 kbps * 53 = 1.526 Mbps
28.8 kbps * 54 = 1.555 Mbps

So technically they should have used the numbers 52 and 53. :-)

        There is more to this than meets the eye -- 28.8K is asynchronous
        and has start and stop bits for every byte, so there are a maximum
        of 2880 bytes/sec available over 28.8K.  Then there is the issue
        of latency and IP overhead which tends to approximate 89% of the
        available bandwidth, or 2880 x .89 = 2563 bytes/sec.  The T1 circuit
        normalized to bytes/sec is (1536000 / 8) = 192000 bytes/sec, so
        accounting for apples and oranges shows 192000 / 2563 = 74.91 sessions.
        Ofcourse, this assumes that all 75 28.8K modems are pulling data
        in the same direction at the same time.  In reality, traffic for
        most ISPs runs about 4:1 to 5:1 inflows vs outflows.  Because T1
        circuits are full duplex (1536000 bps in two directions at the
        same time), and assuming a 4:1 ratio of inflows to outflows, this
        would allow 75 + (75 / 4) = 93 28.8K connections.  Fortunately,
        customers don't actually saturate the lines the entire time they
        are connected -- some actually pause to read the screen once in
        a while -- so the real usage on the line has a tendency to
        approach 8:1, 10:1, or even more sessions.  With a conservative
        number of 8:1 inactive to active sessions, 8 x 93 = 744 sessions.
        The Starr Report and other nonsence have a tendency to blow
        these types of calculations out of the water every now and then,
        but then no provider has built their network on the worst case
        scenareo.  YMMV.

        Dave Stoddard
        dgs () us net


Current thread: