nanog mailing list archives
Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad
From: Richard Irving <rirving () oal net>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 12:21:00 -0500
While Bergman was confident ABCNews.com's plans to stream the video in its entirety would go fine, Martin Hall of the IP Multicast Initiative says the real problems would occur at the user's end of the line.
and also
Such major news events could drive home one point: that Internet needs better ways to deal with surges of users.
Ironic that they interviewed Martin. IPMI *is* the solution for just this type of event. Somehow, that never made it into the article.
Current thread:
- And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Christian Nielsen (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Chris Cappuccio (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Richard Irving (Sep 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Jerry Scharf (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Paul Zawada (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad David Stoddard (Sep 18)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Miquel van Smoorenburg (Sep 21)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad David Stoddard (Sep 22)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad John Leong (Sep 22)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Robert Szarka (Sep 22)
- Message not available
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 23)
- Re: And we thought the text part of the Starr Report would be bad Paul Zawada (Sep 18)