nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lawsuit threat against RBL users
From: Karl Denninger <karl () Denninger Net>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 10:24:38 -0600
On Thu, Nov 19, 1998 at 11:10:03AM -0500, Chris Mauritz wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Karl Denninger [mailto:karl () Denninger Net] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 10:26 AM To: Chris Mauritz; 'Sheryl Chapin'; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Lawsuit threat against RBL usersThe problem with this is that someone, sooner or later, is going to take a run at people trying to set up what amounts to a set of contractual requirements that exceed legal requirements - and then enforce them network wide. The collusive aspect of this is downright scary, especially when coupled with threats of depeering, active denial of service attacks, etc.*shrug* If I am an ISP, I'm free to have whatever AUP I want. IF clients don't like the AUP, they are free to shop elsewhere. I don't have the ability to force other ISPs to use my AUP or even a close facsimile...nor is there is a method to enforce your 1984 vision anyway. The net is a loose connection of public and private links. If I own a private link and I decide that I'm going to route you into /dev/null...that's what I'll do. There isn't a thing you can do about it.
You're right, as far as that goes. However, when an industry adopts what amount to consistent policies, and those policies reach beyond your own equipment and services (ie: "if you spam from *anywhere*, even if you don't mention our service, even if you don't drop-box onto our service, we will shut down your connection to us") then IMHO you're asking for it. Again, you can do anything you want as an individual company. In this business you can even try to do nearly anythnig you want as a group, since holding together a "cartel" is darn difficult. But if you actually achieve consensus like this, and DO hold it together, there can be trouble.
[snip]There are a lot of "questionable" things that this industry does, but IMHO this one is near or at the top of the list of things I'd talk to my counsel about....Knock yourself out. Be sure to let us know what your legal eagle has to say on the matter. Chris
Why would I take this to my "legal eagle" Chris? I have no stake in this debate, but I believe that it is a good idea to point out that its plain dangerous to play in these waters, and that those of you who want to should be the ones talking to THEIR legal eagles. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl () denninger net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization.
Current thread:
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL, (continued)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Karl Denninger (Nov 19)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Derek Balling (Nov 19)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Bob Allisat (Nov 19)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Derek Balling (Nov 19)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL M. David Leonard (Nov 19)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Dean Robb (Nov 28)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Edward S. Marshall (Nov 19)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL J.D. Falk (Nov 19)
- Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL Rich Sena (Nov 21)
- Re: Lawsuit threat against RBL users Karl Denninger (Nov 19)
- RE: Lawsuit threat against RBL users Bob Allisat (Nov 19)
- Re: Lawsuit threat against RBL users Steven J. Sobol (Nov 19)
- Bob Allisat Wayne (Nov 23)
- Re: Bob Allisat Karl Mueller (Nov 23)
- Re: Bob Allisat John M. Brown (Nov 23)
- Re: Bob Allisat Rusty Zickefoose (Nov 23)
- RE: Lawsuit threat against RBL users Derek Balling (Nov 19)
- Re: Lawsuit threat against RBL users Steven J. Sobol (Nov 19)