nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff?
From: Scott Whyte <swhyte () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 16:51:40 -0700
Waaaaay ahead of us: http://www.tripplite.com/y2k/index.html At 07:25 PM 5/11/98 -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
Probably for the same reason Tripp-Lite UPSes are "Internet Ready" -- marketing buzzword completeness.That must mean... Yes! Tripp-Lite UPSes are also y2k compliant! They must be *much* better than those other UPS's. Perhaps someone should call Tripp-Lite to be sure they are y2k compliant... --Dean
---- Scott Whyte swhyte () cisco com | Any opinions expressed herein are Network Supported Accounts (NSA) | mine and not cisco's... CCIE 3340 | "Eschew Obfuscation"
Current thread:
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Eric Germann (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dalvenjah FoxFire (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Michael Dillon (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Forrest W. Christian (May 09)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dalvenjah FoxFire (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Michael Shields (May 09)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dean Anderson (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Jay R. Ashworth (May 11)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dean Robb (May 11)
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Eric Germann (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Scott Whyte (May 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? John Butler (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 08)
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Greg Ketell (May 11)