nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff?
From: jkucic () kpmg com
Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 19:22:43 -0400
Hi, Eric Germann <ekgermann () CCTEC COM>,Internet writes:
Do we really care if an unmanaged hub is Y2K compliant? As long as it forwards packets....
I don't but its an opportunity to sell the client. And if you don't test it I recommend you don't get quoted saying it doesn't matter unless you want a lawsuit if anything happens. Customers want everything in writing to be Year 200 compliant or not having any affect on their operation and in many cases regulators are mandating it in writing. Thanks, Joe Kucic
Current thread:
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Eric Germann (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dalvenjah FoxFire (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Michael Dillon (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Forrest W. Christian (May 09)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dalvenjah FoxFire (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Michael Shields (May 09)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dean Anderson (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Jay R. Ashworth (May 11)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dean Robb (May 11)
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Eric Germann (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Scott Whyte (May 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? John Butler (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 08)
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Greg Ketell (May 11)