nanog mailing list archives

Re: RBL Update (Re: Lets go vixie!! rbl)


From: NetSurfer <netsurf () sersol com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 19:51:39 -1000 (HST)


If this interpretation was correct don't you think that given this
litiguous society and some spammers such as Stinkus.com who have sued
before, that *someone* would have filed suit by now? 


On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Dean Anderson wrote:

Yes. Any spam blocking when you aren't a party to the email is illegal. You
are an attorney. Come on.  This isn't relevent. Nor is it a departure from
anything I have said, previously.





--
James D. Wilson
netsurf () sersol com

"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
    William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)



Current thread: