nanog mailing list archives

Re: $110,000 for Gated Source Code


From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 23:31:00 -0700

At 11:48 PM 6/8/98 -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Scott Mace wrote:

I think you would be suprised at the number of commercial networking
vendors that use GateD source code as the basis for their routing
protocol suite...

And if they're going to sell products based on gated, they should be
paying royalties to the Gated Consortium...but why should the average ISP
that wants to try some of the features of gated 4.x be forced to put down
a big chunk of change?  Many ISPs will have the attitude "if I have to
spend X on gated, and still pay for the hardware and figure out the
software, I'll just hand the money to Cisco and have one company to point
fingers at if it doesn't work or breaks."

Actually, I'll just use 3.5.9 and point my corporate fingers at MERIT if it
doesn't work, or breaks. Further, if I have run-rime problems I may point
legal fingers that way, as well. Flemming *has* a point, since GateD is NSF
funded, it shouldn't be for-profit. I guarantee that my tax dollars are
already paying for it. Why should I pay extra?
___________________________________________________ 
Roeland M.J. Meyer, ISOC (InterNIC RM993) 
e-mail: <mailto:rmeyer () mhsc com>rmeyer () mhsc com
Internet phone: hawk.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: <http://www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer>www.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: <http://www.mhsc.com/>www.mhsc.com/
___________________________________________ 
SecureMail from MHSC.NET is coming soon!  


Current thread: