nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU of the Internet?
From: "Steven L. Johnson" <stjohnso () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 22:16:47 -0800
At 05:46 PM 2/7/98 GMT, William Allen Simpson wrote:
I hate to extend this thread any, but there is too much misinformation to let slide....
[...]
As to the proposal that the big packets could be sliced and diced to allow a smaller interactive packet thru -- well, the PPP fragmentation header has been out there for years, but nobody really implements it, even for multi-link. Too much pain, not enough gain. Same problems as ATM.
I've heard of people configuring only one link within a MLPPP bundle and saying that it helps in some cases. http://www/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113ed_cr/dial_c/dcpr t2/dcppp.htm#xtocid35927 -Steve
Current thread:
- Re: MTU of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Henry Linneweh (Feb 06)
- RE: MTU of the Internet? Peter Ford (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Paul A Vixie (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Paul A Vixie (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Frank Kastenholz (Feb 09)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Frank Kastenholz (Feb 09)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Paul A Vixie (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Steven L. Johnson (Feb 09)
- Message not available
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? John Hawkinson (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Charles Sprickman (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Mr. Dana Hudes (Feb 10)