nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU of the Internet?
From: Henry Linneweh <linneweh () concentric net>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 17:54:46 -0800
My only response on this issue with its great response is, this in only another way for microsoft to entrench itself to gain control of the entire network with its products and power trip savvy! Henry R. Linneweh Joe Provo - Network Architect wrote:
tonyhain () microsoft com wrote:This thread has drifted all over the place and the only conclusions I can see are: The core infrastructure MTU is >= 1500 People are telling clients to set their Win95 MTU to 576 PMTU is randomly broken by clueless filtering Some dial-access devices are buffer limited A small MTU (53 byte?) would increase perceived response at the expense of performanceYou missed: HTTP is a painful protocol. jzp
-- ¢4i1å
Current thread:
- Re: MTU of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Marc Slemko (Feb 09)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Patrick McManus (Feb 09)
- HTTP proxy servers (was Re: MTU of the Internet?) Matt Ranney (Feb 12)
- Message not available
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Mike Hedlund (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Mike Hedlund (Feb 09)
- Message not available
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Dean Gaudet (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Henry Linneweh (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Paul A Vixie (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Paul A Vixie (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Frank Kastenholz (Feb 09)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Frank Kastenholz (Feb 09)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Steven L. Johnson (Feb 09)